uhhuh A Cute Girl Who Could Actually Exist In Real Life
Scholars, poets, and bards agreed on one thing alone—
she loved her husband, Chrom, above all else.
HeyLasFas! - #GoChieOrGoHOME - #ElizabethIsTheElizaBEST


-----------------------------------------------------
Info
Female - 20
Incredibly Bi
Kirkland, WA
Conceptual Artist
Layout Designer
Writer
Audio Engineer
Married to alexisnotaobot

-----------------------------------------------------
Biography
Did you know I can only think of four things at a time? Right now I'm thinking about the number 77, time signature metered time signatures, cute anime characters, and a haircut.

No seriously, feel free to talk to me for whatever reason. Askbox is always open as well as Skype.

Tumblr Avatar by fyre-flye!
--------------------------------------------
Things You Should Talk To Me About:
Robot Girls
Zero Escape/9h9p9d / VLR:GPD
Fire Emblem
Prequel Adventure
SMT:P4
SMT:P3
MGS
NGE
PMMM

That was not a smart move, Sigma.

blog.iskyart.com →

lol1759:

heylasfas:

lol1759:

heylasfas:

lol1759:

lol1759:

doomy:

birdhorse:

doomy:

birdhorse:

say it with me, kids

they/them is a valid gender-neutral singular pronoun

this has nothing to do with the gender binary/etc

it’s just fucking correct English

????? they/them is plural, not singular.

try both,…

Wow. Just wow. Good try. But again, what is acceptable in common speech/slang doesn’t cut it.

um like isn’t the idea of language itself “what is acceptable in common speech”?

Heh…

I’d really like to see some nice sources that definitively consider the word “they” not an acceptable use as a singular genderless pronoun, if you wouldn’t mind…

See college board.

I’m pretty sure you’re the one making the counter-argument, I’d like to see more than just a textless reference somewhere.

Maybe a link to an article or an academic thesis regarding your point?

sharkthemepark:

From The Telegraph:

“The first of use of "them” for “him or her” is a rather later 1742 (“Little did I think… to make a… complaint against a Person very dear to you,… but dont let them be so proud… as to make them not care how they affront everybody else”, from Samuel Richardson’s Pamela, or, Virtue Rewarded). “Themselves” goes all the way back to 1464 (“Inheritements, of which any of the seid persones… was seised by theym self, or joyntly with other”, from the Parliamentary rolls). And “their”, Allan’s particular dislike, was recorded at an unknown year in the 1300s (“Bath ware made sun and mon, Aiþer wit þer ouen light”, from Cursor Mundi).“

I don’t have time for this. Your ignorance isn’t my problem.

I concede on the basis of “it’s fucking 1am IDGAF”.

I am actively trying not to be ignorant and I’m (within reason I presume) asking for academic sources so that I can with gusto have a firm understanding of your point.

I can’t already have your knowledge confirmed on its own, such an idea would be ignorant in its own right, wouldn’t it? To automatically assume you are correct with just a few uncited words?

You speak from knowledge of multiple academic fields, surely you must be aware that if you write a thesis without amply citing your research your work might be considered invalid?

Don’t worry if you’re tired or actively DGAF, I just wanted to firmly know the knowledge you knew. If you care to pick this up in the morning, I’ll happily oblige! I do love learning new things if you are willing…

And to my followers:

I’m sorry for picking up this little talk if this isn’t the thing you care to see on your dashboard. lol1759 just might know something I don’t about one of the more subtle intricacies of the English language, and I’d be curious to learn from them if they are willing.

10:53pm · Friday, March 7th, 2014 · 57 notes
via: lol1759 · source: birdhorse
  1. unsurpassedtravesty reblogged this from princesslyoko and added:
    I don’t even get where people are getting ‘they is never singular’ from. If I had to guess, anyone using it is pulling...
  2. ima-giant-turtle reblogged this from birdhorse and added:
    also say this with me kids if you’re more worried about being grammatically correct for a split second than someone’s...
  3. doomy reblogged this from nerthos and added:
    dangggg nice
  4. gwennie-chan reblogged this from birdhorse
  5. vollystormbopper reblogged this from ghoulmaterial
  6. princesslyoko reblogged this from birdhorse and added:
    As long as nobody is suggesting they wouldn’t use they/them if someone preferred the pronouns, I’m cool.
  7. ramblingjj reblogged this from silverlightpony
  8. silverlightpony reblogged this from dalkenstarbyne
  9. dalkenstarbyne reblogged this from birdhorse and added:
    Friendly reminder: language is always evolving, there’s an innumerable amount of “standards,” and that standard changes...
  10. heylasfas reblogged this from lol1759 and added:
    I am actively trying not to be ignorant and I’m (within reason I presume) asking for academic sources so that I can with...
  11. agonistagent reblogged this from heylasfas and added:
    The SAT does say that singular they is incorrect, but that’s completely against what linguists say. This is actually a...
  12. lol1759 reblogged this from heylasfas and added:
    I don’t have time for this. Your ignorance isn’t my problem.I concede on the basis of “it’s fucking 1am IDGAF”.
  13. punchy-beau reblogged this from ghoulmaterial
  14. deersyrup reblogged this from doomy and added:
    From The Telegraph: “The first of use of "them” for “him or her” is a rather later 1742 (“Little did I think… to make a…...
  15. averymiaou reblogged this from birdhorse and added:
    yup. and I wish people would stop using “they/them isn’t a valid thing for referring to someone because england language...
  16. ghoulmaterial reblogged this from iiboharz
  17. birdhorse posted this
viwan themes