Let’s test your sexuality!

birdflashed:

fallingfromthetrapeze:

itsstuckyinmyhead:

sadtubaplayer:

http://vistriai.com/kinseyscaletest/

I got a four, what did you get?

I failed it….it said i was an unusual person. Which is true so.

I got a four :3

I got a 3, I guess that’s pretty correct

Well, then.

erin-kirkland-the-emerald-isle:

too-razzle-dazzle:

slitmemory:

slitmemory:

too-razzle-dazzle:

this was just thrown together for a friend who wasn’t 100% when i mentioned i was ace. this is mostly based on how i personally feel so i hope i didn’t offend any of you =)

THIS IS AMAZING THANK YOU SO MUCH OMG I CAN USE THIS IN THE FUTURE!!!

And that’s a great size for mobile pics!

i’m so glad

itjustifiesthebeans

aww but I wanna fuck shit up!

(also this is very informative for those confused at the idea of asexuality)

gentlemanbones:

crablice:

megidolas:

holy shit

…

FUCK. YES.

Oh whew, for a second I thought that was ten out of a hundred and I was about to get motherfucking offended.

skindeeptales:

Teresa Sharpe

Indiana - USA

urulokid:

millika:

Who’s Alex?

Billboard demonstrating gender stereotypes as most people automatically assume that Alex is the boy.

Actually, I’ve studied design and advertising, and I can tell you that the reason people would look at this and immediately assume Alex is the boy is because, quite simply, the boy is the focal point of the ad.

English-speaking readers’ line of sight goes from left to right and up to down. This ad leads the viewer from the words MEET ALEX etc straight to the boy and then over and down to the girl. I didn’t even notice there was a set of parenthesis with words in them in the ad until I looked the fourth time. 

This is a fallacious confirmation bias, as anyone looking at it will assume Alex is the focal point (i.e. The Boy) and then if they’re perceptive they’ll notice the words at the bottom. Aha! Those damn gender stereotypes gotcha again! Except no, because the ad literally forces you to read it as “Alex is the boy” by the visual language and lines of sight. 

A better ad would have been structured from top to bottom instead of left to right, and wouldn’t have pushed the girl, the real subject of the ad (who, by the way, has been VISUALLY PUSHED OUT OF HER RIGHTFUL SPACE ON THE AD BY HER BROTHER) off to the corner as far away from her identifiers as possible. 

Here, I’ll make you a better ad.

Bam. Shitty stock photo but you get the point. If anyone sees this and assumes Alex is the boy, they don’t have the the ad layout to use as an excuse for their internalized gender shittery. Likewise, the ad isn’t actively trying to make you read it a certain way and THEN making you feel guilty for interpreting it the way they designed it to be. 

y'all jerks need to take a few design courses, good on you urulokid for bringin’ forth the knowledge

I’m honestly laughing at the fact that my mother’s date called me useless. Like a 63 year old man insulting a 19 year old kid that has literally nothing to do with him. At this point it’s hilarious.

Like, you’re 63. Seriously. This is Highschool level shit.

he’s up to something

solarsenpai:

siopold:

miracleyangwenli:

siopold:

the funny thing about dril posts is that they actually do have a structure to them– they hit a kind of conceptual caesura halfway through, a point where there’s no inevitable logical connection between what’s been said and what’s still to come. here, the first sentence didn’t need to result in the second, yet it’s not “lol random” either; the speaker is angry about his boss’ draconian ferret-kissing policy, and reacts in kind, and even the reference to a “screen saver” reminds us that we’re in an office. it’s a narrative progression that, despite having an internal logic, alienates its punchline from its setup. who the hell is this person?

one thing i love about @dril posts is how they all seem to take place in a universe that is somewhat like our own, but with the habitus of white middle america taken to a bizarre, absurd, but strangely logical conclusion. take this one, for instance: 

so we have our setting: a security guard protecting the american flag in the betsy ross museum, something almost archetypically american and middle class. but once again the first part, or setup, for the punchline, “fucking the flag,” careens the joke into an alien punchline that still, given the setting, makes sense. @dril’s security guard character imitates a sort-of cop-talk, the banter of a security guard, “buddy, they wont even let me fuck it”. you can imagine a similar response from a guard at any museum, but we’re talking about Fucking the American Flag, here. 

i really love @dril. 

it’s astonishing that a human being thinks of those posts. some person, someone out there whose existence we have to infer, because all we know is that those posts occur and they must be coming from somewhere. “the @dril​ tweeter” resonates as “the beowulf poet” does, except beowulf (which i’ve only read in translation, so i’m not an authority) has never made any use of the english language as baffling and sublime and somehow primally interlaced with the stuff of human consciousness as “IF THE ZOO BANS ME FOR HOLLERING AT THE ANIMALS I WILL FACE GOD AND WALK BACKWARDS INTO HELL.”

This is my favorite post, I am so glad I found it again.